Posters S11-S14 and 28-46
|
S11) |
High incidence of anterior femoral cortex notching using navigation system in total knee arthroplasty Minoda Y, Watanabe K, Yoshida T, Ikebuchi M, Iwaki H, Nakamura H |
|
S12) |
Clinical outcomes of patient-specific (MyKnee™) cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty: preliminary prospective study results Goldberg TD, Curry WT, Bush JW |
|
S13) |
Clinical results and survivorship of the navigated Columbus total knee arthroplasty at five year follow-up Sciberras NC, Baines J, Deakin AH, Picard F |
|
S14) |
Computer-assisted navigation system helps experienced surgeon improve outcome in total knee arthroplasty Jih YK, To W, Sung HC, Feng SW, Wen YC |
|
28) |
Navigation system assisted dual-plane high tibial osteotomy to treat the varus deformity of knee joint Liu MD, Zhang MD, Feng MD |
|
29) |
Measurement of the knee flexion angle with a smartphone application is precise and accurate Jenny JY |
|
30) |
Comparison of stability and functional outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomical vs. non-anatomical femoral tunnel Seon JK, Song EK, Yim JH, Moon JY |
|
31) |
Results of total knee arthroplasty with Nexgen® implant using navigation system (Brainlab®): results with a 5-year follow up Lee YG, Jeon SY, Shin HK, Choi YH, Yoon YS, Lee HS, Kwak WS, Lee YH |
|
32) |
Does the reducing femoral component in PS-TKA using computer-assisted surgery has no impact on the extension gap? A cadaveric study Chutchawan P, Ruangthong N, Sriphirom P |
|
33) |
Application of Allen spine system in intraoperative three-dimensional image (O-arm) based navigation surgery Koyama K, Michiura E, Yagi T, Fujita Y, Akazawa T, Minami S, Kotani T |
|
34) |
A new computer-aided and robot-assisted surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Huynh LM, Kim YH |
|
35) |
Aging effect on femoral stress fracture risk after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty Kim YH, Kim K, Park WM |
|
36) |
A new registration method for imageless computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study Davis ET, Bathis H, Mayman D, Wegner M, Schubert M, Gneiting S |
|
37) |
Acetabular component placement using imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion – comparison with non-navigated total hip arthroplasty Chang JD, Ranjan B, Kim IS |
|
38) |
Computer navigation aided precision resection part of acetabular and reconstuction with total hip prosthesis for malignant bone tumor around acetabular Nio X, Zhang Q |
|
39) |
Towards a height and inclination adjustable tibial plate to postoperatively correct the residual ligament imbalance Almouahed S, Hamitouche C, Stindel E, Roux C |
|
40) |
Differing prosthetic alignment and femoral component sizing among three computer assisted CT-free navigation systems in TKA Sasaki HI, Matsumoto TO, Shibanuma NA, Kubo SE, Tei KA, Matsumoto AK, Kuroda RO, Kurosaka MA |
|
41) |
Reconstructed CT assessment of image-free navigation assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in Asian physique Oh KJ, Kim TH |
|
42) |
Robot-assisted, custom-made massive medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty for traumatic bone and joint loss Andrews BL, Sunmugam S, Floyd D, Aqil A, Cobb JP |
|
43) |
Development and assessment of the automatic rehabilitation Hung SS, Yen PL, Lee MY |
|
44) |
Use of computer-aided navigation systems in static and dynamic stability testing of ACL-deficient and reconstructed knees: in-vivo evaluation with Orthopilot ACL 3.0 Koh JL, Laskovski J |
|
45) |
Cup placement accuracy with robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty Padgett DE, Conditt MA, Jones JA, Branch SH, Dunbar NJ, Banks SA |
|
46) |
Registration and tracking accuracy of the HipSextantTM navigation system in patients with DDH Tokunaga K, Ikeda T |